Greg Detre
Monday, 29 May, 2000
Prof. Tasioulas
Is the �impartiality�
utilitarianism requires of agents unreasonably burdensome?
Is it inconsistent with
personal integrity?
Does it unacceptably override
the personal point of view?
How, if at all,
should utilitarians respond to potential conflicts between an agent�s
well-being and the maximisation of their community�s welfare?
should a moral theory be in line with customary morality?
what are we calculating � are we calculating the utility until eternity (since different paths will collapse down to a single line as different actions and states of affairs ultimately end up as the same state of affairs, e.g. the Earth being swallowed up by the sun, whether or not I murder my grandmother), or are we comparing a pair of states of affairs, or